More like nature or God saw a need for this planet increasing the vibration upwards towards enlightenment, and geez, someone's gotta do it, and Maharishi was the man. He did revive the ancient wisdom of the Veda and bring it out in pure form, or useful, worthwhile form anyway.
Whether or not Maharishi's efforts are needed or not, time will tell. I do recall him answering a question back in the 60's I think about how he, one man, could enlighten the world, and he said he'd make copies of himself. So perhaps there are enough copies of him running about now that his efforts as a single individual are no longer needed. What is your take on that? Thanks, Jim --- In [email protected], Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Jim, > > I infer from your posts that you buy into Maharishi's contention that he is > the "Founder of the Age of Enlightenment." - That he is exclusively or > primarily responsible for enlightening the world. Outside the TM movement > this contention appears ludicrous. At one time he was a major player in the > effort. That time has passed. I think that now, anything he does or doesn't > do is of little consequence. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
