--- In [email protected], bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], "Llundrub" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > > Bob, nobodies stake in the movement is or was as high as the 
> > > Kaplains. Therefore you have no right to judge them. They gave 
> > more 
> > > than anyone, and all they wanted was one single promise to 
come 
> > true. 
> > > >
> > > 
> > > **********
> > > 
> > > When you go to Disneyland and get on a E-ticket ride (maybe E 
> > tickets 
> > > are passe, who knows), you stay on the ride til the end for 
> > complete 
> > > satisfaction. The Ks left -- too bad for them, but they were 
> fools.
> > > 
> > > The Ks could have been 200percenters, rich and enlightened, 
but 
> > like 
> > > stereotypical snotty rich kids,
> > > they threw a tantrum, made a lot of 
> > > faces, and left with their baseball glove, instead of sticking 
> > around 
> > > and helping the movement to grow. 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> > "snotty rich kids"?
> > 
> > Hmmm.  I would have thought that that description would have 
> applied 
> > to kids to inherited money.
> > 
> > Didn't these guys (or at least Earl) make all their money from 
> > scratch?
> > 
> 
> **********
> 
> Nope. Just when Earl was about to part ways with the books r fun 
type 
> of company he was working for, his dad gave him $200,000 seed 
money 
> to start his own company -- (prior to his stint for the books r 
fun 
> type company, Earl's appliance biz and tofu in Fairfield never 
made 
> much money -- I may be mixing up the brothers here, but their 
> businesses prior to Earl's books r fun were not significant 
> moneymakers). More to the point of what I had said originally, 
Earl 
> and his twin brother developed their creativity through TM and an 
MIU 
> education, so they were dynamic enough to not be trust fund types, 
> but unfortunately not dynamic enough to survive Bevanity down 
there 
> in Boone.


$200,000 is hardly "rich kid money"...it's just about enough to buy 
one a sub-average to average single family dwelling outside any 
major city in America.  $2,000,000 given to your child I would say 
is the minimum that could be described as rich kid money.

"Rich kid money" is especially not a description for someone who was 
able to take that $200,000 and turn it into $300 million...that's 
about a 150,000 percent return on investment.

A snotty rich kid is one who takes $2,000,000, loses it all, and 
turns it into a tax write-off for Daddy.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to