> David Spero wrote: > > Thank you for your comments and input - all of you - since > it helps me to go into deeper and deeper critical examination > of my own work. Namaste, DS
ok david, since you are examining your work here in public, i'd like to ask straight out: what is your work? i have some sense of what it is, and enjoy seeing you; but further off-the-cuff explanations from you here would be clarifying. > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "oneradiantbeing" > > <oneradiantbeing@> wrote: > > > > > > Follow-up comment: I think I made it pretty clear that Shakti is > a > > > property of Consciousness or the Absolute. It is the Absolute, as > > > energy, and not radiated intentionally or effortfully, which > would > > > amount to a mere manipulation of energy. On my YT > video, "Forgiving > > > the Teacher," I make it clear that Shakti functions outside of > human > > > individuality. > > > > Hi David, and thanks for the lift after lunch, and for your > discussion > > of the whole shakti thing. The 5-10 seconds I watched of your you > tube > > video was really enjoyable, and well integrated. Great message!:-) > > >
