--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Nice Curtis! > > I need to email you and reconnect. > > From one unenlightened dude to another > > Steve >
That would be great Steve, you were one of the most entertaining guys at Sidhaland. Unenlightened guys get the hottest chicks and don't let anyone tell ya different! > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" > <jflanegi@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Great youtube videos. He, he, we are all "aspirants" and > he > > > is the > > > > > > "enlightened teacher". Step right up, step right up... > > > > > > > > > > > yeah, I'll bet it really pissed you off in grade school when > > > > > the "teacher" referred to you as a "student"... > > > > > > > > Not at all. The relationship was appropriately named. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you just read the words "enlightened teacher" > and "aspirant" > > > as > > > > > words with definitions, vs. loading them with baggage, it is > > > easier to > > > > > see what he is talking about. Dr. Phil, who's common sense I > > > enjoy, > > > > > refers to this loading as psychological sunburn; because of > > > events in > > > > > the past, even a mention of a word or phrase evokes strong > > > emotion. > > > > > I'm not dissing you, just noticing your reaction to those > words. > > > DS > > > > > doesn't strike me as a power tripper in the least.:-) > > > > > > > > So not recognizing people's self proclaimed superior enlightened > > > > status is a psychological problem that I have that Dr. Phil can > > > help > > > > me with? That is super news for me! > > > > > > > Why is the self proclaimed status any different whether its > someone > > > calling themselves doctor because they did a thesis or med > school, > > > and graduated, or calling themselves enlightened because they did > > > self realization school, and graduated? Either way there has been > an > > > achievement, but so what? Life is full of achievements. Why are > > > either of them, the doc or the enlightened, or both of them, > > > considered "superior" as a result? And why not just recognize > them > > > for what they have accomplished? I don't get the issue with > that.:-) > > > > > > > David: "Thanks for deconstructing the notion that within teaching > > enlightenment there is an inherent, unspoken position of authority > or > > superiority. That was right on! Namaste, DS" > > > > Me: I'll let David explain it to you since he is obviously much more > > enlighteneder than you are (with the website and all). If you pay > > attention you may reach your next stage of enlightenmentedness > through > > recognizing your relationship with his higher degree of > > enlightendenessinment. (That is unless your own psychological > sunburn > > doesn't allow you to submit to your true relationship with him as > > living a state of less enlightnedernessinment than he has, you know > > like an MD, so what's the problem?) > > > > Meanwhile common dudes like me will just have to settle for our own > > level of nonenlightenmentesque lives. Or is it > unenlightenmenedness? > > Either way you guys can work this one out amongst yourselves and I > > wont worry my pretty little head about such lofty matters. > > >
