--There are some non-sequiturs in the paragraph below. It says "you
are at home in that (the dynamic aspect of life). Then it says "Being
at home, therefore you are happy....". Non-Sequitur. There are
plenty of creatures "at home" but grossly unhappy.
Then it says "Therefore life is bliss". Doesn't follow at all!.
Last, it says "all else is illusion". There's a problem here. What
is the "all else"?? This is shaping up to be a tautology.
The conclusion " life is bliss" may be true but it's not supported by
the supposed logic of the previous statements.
>
>
> Existence exists, therefore interaction of the full potential of
> existence - its opposite potentials of point and infinity - occurs.
> Therefore activity occurs, therefore dynamism flourishes and
> propogates. You are that existence and its inherent dynamism.
Therefore
> you are at home in that. Being at home, therefore you are happy in
this
> universe, which is your cherished home where you grew up as a
species.
> Therefore life is bliss, because you are always at home in this
> universe. All else is illusion.
>
> Therefore, life is bliss.
> All else is self-illusion, ie.untrue.
>
> OffWorld
>
>
>
> >
> > Tom T:
> > You have now *got* the Byron Katie system down pat. Her questions
lead
> > one to the conclusion you are asking those here to come to.
Awesome!.
> Tom
> >
>
