--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > wrote: > > Idiot. He railed against it in Congress before the war, far stronger > > than ANYONE else. > > Rick, correct me if I'm wrong. I seem to recall Offworld being one of > the most insistent that posters be banned for insulting him or > others. And yet, here we are, with EVERYONE being much more civil and > respectful, and yet Offworld continues to berate those with whose > opinion he disagrees. >>
You are ENTIRELY wrong about that, but your prejudice smells a mile a way. I was not remotely involved in that childish argument you guys had about banning people, except when it was used unfairly against one person but not another. I was not part of your little boys stupid argument. <<< I'm sorry to say that this is a common trait of > bullies - complain about being on the receiving end of the treatment > they regularly dish out. Can you ask Offworld to refraim from calling > people "idiots". >>> The word 'idiot' was OBVIOUSLY referring to the writer of the magazine article, not the FFL member that posted the article. I am sorry I did not make that clearer, but you should be more careful before you start ranting like crazy person. You're extreme prejudice has just put me off FFL permanently. So no need to ban...I'm gone. People like you are so childish and constantly on the lookout to express your frustrations about your own life and project them upon other people. Outta here OffWorld <<<I feel we doing with the consensus method of > indentifying offensive posts. > > lurk > > > > > >
