--- In [email protected], Bronte Baxter 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  
>   Off-World, you're making some good points, I think. Insults can 
fall anywhere on a line continuum, from a 1 to a 10, with sarcasm 
being a 1. So where do we draw the line on the line? Well, sarcasm is 
considered a fair strategy in a formal debate. Name-calling isn't. 
Implying that someone's reasoning isn't sound, or even saying so 
outright, is also allowed in a formal debate. Outrightly calling 
someone stupid isn't. >>

Lol, sarcasm is not considred a fair strategy it is flaming.


>    
>   What would a basketball game be with no rules? There wouldn't be 
a game. Rules -- the good ones -- exist to promote the game, to 
protect people's fun, not to spoil it.>>

The rules have not been agreed upon. The rule should be that when 
someone admits that they deliberately are on FFL to get people angry, 
they should be banned for that. There are at least 2 people who have 
admitted to that, and they have no place on FFL. You should also be 
almost be banned for supporting these flamers outright, and for using 
irrational arguments and poorly developed depth of perception on a 
topic. It is an insult to my intelligence and people should be banned 
for insulting people. Who decides the rules of flaming? If someone 
admits that they come on here deliberately to inflame, push people's 
buttons and anger people, then that, in my book is by far the worst 
form of flaming...and to everyone here that does it....you are a sad 
and pathetic little man.

Now, the rules were ill-considered to continue to allow someone to 
post who admits they post only to people they disagree with to makw 
them angry so that they can take over the board with one-sided people 
who congratulate themselves all the time for having gottn rid of 
anyone they don't agree with. That is Nazism and should be against 
the rules. Hence Lurk who is the one who has been going on and on 
about flaming ad nauseaum, should be banned for all these reasons 
above. 
Those are the new rules. Admitting to deliberate inflaming should be 
dealt with. 

OffWorld


Reply via email to