Thnaks Kala
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <smithybill@> 
wrote:
> >
> > Namaskaram Kala Devi,
> > 
> > I'll use a non TM mantra as an example!
> > 
> > Let's say the bija is `Shreem' for the basic TM technique.
> > 
> > Let's say `Om Shreem Namaha' for an advanced technique.
> > 
> > Finally let's say `Om Shreem Maha Lakshmiyei Swaha' for a more 
> > advanced technique.
> > 
> > From your experience, am I correct in saying that `Om Shreem 
Maha 
> > Lakshmiyei Swaha' would be the most powerful of all 3 meditation 
> > mantras?
> 
> 
> Not necessarily, as mantras depend on the disposition of the 
student, most especially the 
> students mind. There are some techniques utilizing merely a bija 
mantra which truly go 
> beyond the mind (but there are specific techniques in addition to 
the mantra in order to do 
> so).
> 
> Now if, for example, the Lakshmi mantra IS appropriate for a 
certain student and they 
> know the appropriate techniques to use that mantra fully, it could 
render full results. But 
> merely giving out mantras for mental repetition, comparitively 
there could be little or no 
> difference. However if paying wads of money made one think they 
had something more 
> special or important, the change in attitude could affect the 
students experience of that 
> mantra, as silly as that sounds, because the resolve and intent 
has changed.
> 
>  In addition to the mental use of mantra there are hosts of other 
techniques which can be 
> applied in addition to or with the mantra. Often as the experience 
of subtlety of mantra 
> refines, techniques will refine to take the mind deeper, beyond 
where the mantra 
> *appears* to end and to allow the meditator to go much further, 
deeper and longer 
> (sounds like porn! :-) ).
> 
> Adhikara mantras, mantras which are chosen based on the student, 
are always favorable 
> to mantras merely given by puja. With an indiscrimantly given 
mantra, there is always the 
> potential for something to go wrong.
> 
> Kala Devi
>


Reply via email to