--- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How about suggesting to Bronte that she dig > > up some nasty articles about Rama and post > > them here, eh? *That* should be easy enough > > research even for someone of her limited > > intellectual capabilities; the Net is just > > *full* of such articles...even an idiot > > could find them. > > Rama is a black belt! > > http://www.fredericklenz.com/ > > etc.
Obviously, Willytex is a lazy sort in that he went for the EASY slam. As I said in the original post, even an idiot could find negative posts about Rama on the Net, and sure enough, one did. :-) Now if he'd had any balls, or creativity, Wee Willy would have gone for the other, more difficult chal- lenge I posted: > And for Judy, I think that you should urge Bronte > to go out and find articles suggesting that editors > are the *real* cause of everything that is wrong > with society, and post them here. When I wrote this, I was just trippin' on things that Bronte could research in her ongoing quest for revenge. I never thought that there really *might* be any articles out there suggesting that editors were evil. But when Willy replied so stupidly, not even *bothering* to take on the more fun of the two challenges, I decided to see if he *could* have found any dirt on editors if he'd had the balls to try. And voila, on my first Google, I find this: http://www.writesideout.com/contestWinners.htm Apologies in advance to Judy, although she'll probably find it as funny as I did. They say that Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, but it would appear that writers who've had their manu- scripts rejected or gutted by editors may just have a bit of fury goin' on themselves. :-)
