--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't claim anything about 9-11 -- rocket attack included. > I merely reported where I still had open questions. Willy > sent me to an excellent debunking site, but you're avoiding > the big issues and trying to make me out to a conspiracy nut > about a "small blip," when the larger issues of evil are > ignored by you. > > You are refusing to show your cards and not answer the > accusations I've made about you. > > Who would you vote for? Show us you heart.
When you do, Curtis, don't forget to wear it on your sleeve and milk it for all the sappy emotion you can. If you work at it, you can probably work up some decent right- eous anger to go along with the sappy emotion. As I said before, and still think I'm right about, "Righteous anger is the closest that some people can get to feeling righteous." They milk the heavy emotional issues to try to get themselves to *feel* something. They use these heavy emotion issues the same way that a sloppy drunk uses alcohol, to work themselves up to a good cry, or a good rant. Meanwhile, most of the other patrons at the bar have learned to just move to the other end of the bar after the drunk orders his or her third beer. Is this harsh of me? Possibly. But I'm getting really tired of people getting a Righteous Anger Jones on and trying to convince others that they're actually *doing something* about any of the things they're using as an excuse for ranting. I think they're just ranting because that's the only time they feel alive.
