--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- hugheshugo richardhughes103@ wrote:
> >
> >> >
> > > I'm going to assume this isn't a joke, if I'm wrong
> > > and you're just
> > > pulling our legs I apologise in advance and also
> > > doff my cap to your
> > > superior surreality.
> > >
> > > This is one of the most weirdly deluded things I've
> > > ever read. I
> > > can't imagine how depressing it must be to have to
> > > resort to
> > > rationalisations like this in an attempt to justify
> > > the failures of
> > > the TMO, failures that you obviously acknowledge.
> > > It's time to face
> > > facts Bob, you can't make a silk purse out of a sows
> > > ear. And that is
> > > the sorry truth.
> >
> > This has always beens Bob's hypothesis to explain the
> > "whacky-factor" in MMY and the TMO. At first I had
> > your reaction, but over the years I've become more and
> > more open to this hypothesis. I mean, why not? It
> > certainly resolves many questions and it lets you feel
> > "otay" about the big Mahesh.
> >
>
> It's a nice idea and I can see where Bob gets it from but I prefer
> Lurkers viewpoint, but OK lets pretend Bob is right. Now imagine a
> delegation of top business men, people like Bill Gates, Richard
> Branson etc, visit TM headquarters and offer to help spread the word.
> What does MMY say? I only employ idiots? No I didn't think so either.
>
> I think M takes what he can get, I'm certain he would rather have had
> Speilberg or Cameron than Lynch. Or Hawking rather than Hagelin but
> that's who was interested. Which is the main criterion for working
> near the top.
>


I'm no at all certain that M would really want Speilberg or Cameron. It
would almost certainly mean giving up total control.  Look at all the
twists and turns Lynch had to go through with his Foundation to have
some control over the resources that he  raised.  A foundation to help
raise an out-of-line TM fee - how silly is that....


JohnY


Reply via email to