> > his first move would be to call in his attorney general and have > > him/her review everything Bush has done in light of its impact > > on the Constitution. He would then reverse every decision which > > had eroded it. (Obama taught constitutional law for 10 years.) > > > > He didn't have any specifics or ideas as to where he would start? > > > > He only had a few minutes to field questions and there were lots > > of them. > > > > I would think somebody with ten years experience teaching > > constitutional law could rattle off, in a couple of seconds, > > a couple of the more egregious examples he would reverse. > > But.... maybe not. > > jstein wrote: > I'm sure he could have. But he may have assumed, > probably quite correctly, that in a crowd where > such a question would come up in the first place > that everyone would already be all too aware of > the more egregious examples, at the very least, > so he didn't really need to spell them out and > would make better use of his limited time by > answering other questions. > Maybe so, but you would think that a political pundit, such as yourself, could, at the very least, give one example of an egregious constitutional law violation, but I guess the other pundits here are so informed that you don't really need to cite one. But you'd think that instead of posting a "me too" message, you would make better use of your limited time by commenting on such other weighty issues as the number of posts made by Barry.
Speaking of weightier matters, where are Obama state Senate files? So, how eactly is Obama going to call in *his* attorney general, if he wins the Presidency, and reverse all those decisions made by the U.S. Attorney General, that presumably the U.S. Congress and the Supreme Court haven't seen fit to question? Apparently Obama can't even land his own plane in Cedar Rapids, IA! Go figure. 'Obama plane lands in wrong Iowa city' By John Whitesides Reuters, November 8th, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/yw9rpr
