--- In [email protected], "suziezuzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I heard from a govenor back in 1996 while on a walk along the 
> Mediteranian Coast in Israel, that Chopra had gone to MMY and asked 
> his opinion on starting an organization in San Diego, California. 
> According to this govenor, MMY was against the whole idea and 
> discouraged him from going ahead with it. Chopra reported this to his 
> business partner who was going to finance the operation and the 
> partner got pissed off and gave Chopra a time limit to decide. So 
> Chopra decided and went off on his own. He wasn't kicked out of the 
> TMO. This was his personal decision. 

If a woman leaves her abusive husband after yrs of getting beat up,
was it her personal decision or did she get kicked out or something
else?  Abused is too strong a word to use in chopra's situation, but
bevan and all the other idiot jealous insiders were thrilled when the
mov'ts most successful and intelligent marketer, by far, left.

The other issue here is the mov't's view that any practice must have
the words Maharishi in front of it or else it's dangerous and you're
"no longer in the mov't" if you consider it.  The mov't should have
been happy that chopra was considering partnering with a respected
mainstream medical facility to study alternative medicine with an
emphasis on ayurveda, but because that facility would certainly want
to investigate other practices beside maharishi ayurveda, then MMY and
the mov't goes crazy and forces him to make a choice, either with us
or against us.  

Basically the movt is a sales organization not a knowledge
organization -- that's the problem.






Reply via email to