Self prior to all distinction? Doesn't that necessarily turn out to be a
verbal quibble? To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a non-self?
Rory Goff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> >
> > R: This simile still implies that the "oil-slick" and the "ocean"
are
> > in
> > > > someway different though, and that's not true.
> >
> >
>
> That well explains why some are so eternally slippery.
"Braman is slippery" -- MMY said it, too, so it must be true :-)
Seriously (more or less), what do you expect of "something" that is
subtler than either-or, a priori to language?
How many here understand that the Self is prior to discrimination?
Mmm?
... Almost everybody.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
