On Jun 1, 2005, at 10:59 PM, Robert Gimbel wrote: > -If one holds a specific meaning of a mantra, it seems to me, that one > is not only holding a limiting value of meaning, but is getting caught > on a superficial level, instead of transcending to the deeper levels > of consciousness. > More important than any specific meaning, is the ability to transcend > using the sound, the vibration, of the mantra. > The whole misunderstanding of meditation, I believe, is the notion, of > getting caught up on meaning, rather than transcending all meaning and > establishing consciousness, in that field which is transcendental to > all meaning...
"The words, their significance and the relationship between the two are eternal." -Vararuchi commenting on Panini. At one level they are separate, in the transcendent they are one, but they are still always connected. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
