Om --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, omg213 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Bevan¹s not married. Men and women get together." > > LBS wrote: > "Deciding that Bevan doesn't deserve a fair shake, as far as I'm > concerned, is dangerous to us all, because it's an erosion of the > principle of fair play and justice." > > If the president of Harvard had a long string of serial affairs with > 15 members or wives of administration and faculty members, and women > who were leaders in the community, it would be a scandal and he >would > be thrown out on his ear. Further, if the Harvard president was > sleeping with numerous students, he would be barred from any >academic > administrative job forever. If the president of Harvard was using >the > power and prestige of his position to seduce students, >administration > and faculty to an extent bordering on rape, he would probably be > brought to court on criminal and civil charges. All of these things > have been alleged against Bevan, apparently repeatedly and > extensively. Why as president of MIU / MUM should he get a "pass" > when any other college president would be thoroughly investigated, >and > if found guilty, strung up and hung, so to speak, at least on a > career, academic, social and moral level? > > Naming women publicly sinks to the level of tabloid journalism and >is > uncalled for. What is called for is a thorough investigation of a college president (who also has the position of being a spritual > leader / conduit / spokesperson for a spiritual community) who has > many allegations of activity totally inappropriate and perhaps >illegal > for his position(s). > > Same for John Haglin. Stories circulate of his being a serial sexual > predator upon MUM community and students. Any presidential candidate > allegedly pursuing woman is such a predatory fashion would be > thoroughly investigated and if evidence was forthcoming, he would be > skewered by the press. Particularly given the double irony that he > also is a spritual leader / conduit / spokesperson for a spiritual > community). Why should he get a free pass? > > Naming women without evidence in a public forum is not the way to > proceed. However, on the other hand, detailing and investigating the > apparently large body of evidence against these university / spirutual leaders as sexual predators is overdue. >
