When I was on MIU faculty a long time ago, I dated more than one of my students. It was no big deal. No one thought anything of it, and a number of faculty members eventually married former students. There was no big age discrepancy between faculty and students in those days.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It is funny to remember when we were students how many faculty > including Domash the president, had student body GFs. Lets make a > quick check, philosophy, art, music, physics, political science, > University President, Dean of Students...it was a perk of the low > paying job I guess. > > Now to the name poster. Please acknowledge that you understand the > point everyone has been making. You may have plenty to contribute and > we all learn by posting. But being stubborn about this without > understanding the feedback you are getting does not bode well for the > relevance of your POV here. No one is trying to curtail your freedom > of speech. But you can learn something about being fair on a public > forum if you are willing. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > > > --- nadarrombus <royboyunity@> wrote: > > > > > the way to talk about the sex lives of people who > > > claim to have a > > > superior knowledge and practice of conducting > > > themselves sexually, ie. > > > claiming purusha, or brahmachari yet commonly known > > > to have had sex > > > partners is exactly this way. > > > > You are a hopeless idiot. It is important to talk > > about this issue, but you don't start listing names of > > the people the alleged perp had sex with. What the > > hell does that do? Its just pure slander. What is so > > difficult to understand about that? > > > > > > > you are sounding like > > > a zealous > > > terrorist. your tone suggests you would protect the > > > reputation of tm > > > leaders with violence to promote your beliefs. > > > > You completely miss my point. English must be your > > second language because you completely and totally > > miss the point I'm making with your recent post and > > this one of mine from several years ago. I am not > > protecting the reputation of the TM leaders. I am > > protecting the reputation of these woman that you > > treat like a terrorist, not giving a shit about the > > effect this has on them and they are the innocent > > victims here. Do you understand this? > > > > > > > you > > > believe you are > > > more right and special like they are cause they are > > > a superior human > > > or have a better purpose than others. you ignore the > > > way of our free > > > society and attempt to introduce totalitarianism. > > > our individual > > > rights protect us from weak minded fools like you. > > > > More rant from your erroneous assumptions. > > > > > > > it is ok for john, > > > bevan and nader ram to be duplicitous in your mind > > > as they are the > > > state before the commune of heaven on earth > > > establishes itself. you > > > continue to use a threatening tone towards the > > > people interested in > > > truth in this forum. there is no slander except your > > > continued > > > aggression to free and truth loving people in your > > > stupid claims that > > > they are not moral enough to have their own > > > information and opinions. > > > we have the right to discuss freely our ideas and > > > opinions despite the > > > terror tactics you continue to employee. no > > > discussion on a forum such > > > as this can have any legal implications whatsoever > > > as it is an open > > > media undefined as fact or fiction, not intended to > > > provide or deride > > > information toward anyone or any group and contains > > > no contractual > > > agreements regarding statements in any > > > way........... > > > > Pal, you are arguing with yourself, because this is > > not even remotely my position. I really don't think > > you get it at all. Here it is again: DO NOT POST THE > > NAMES OF PEOPLE THAT YOU THINK HAVE HAD SEX WITH JOHN, > > BEVAN OR WHOMEVER BECAUSE THAT IS SLANDER. YOU DO NOT > > HAVE THE LEGAL PRIVILEGE NOR THE MORAL RIGHT TO POST > > NAMES. THIS IS HERSEY WRITTEN AS FACT. > > > > Talk all you want about the hypocrisy of the TMO, > > because I agree with you there is plenty of that, but > > listing the names of the innocent is absolute > > bullshit. > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > >
