--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ruth, excellent response and post. I disagree only with your 2d
> > Amend. analysis. Gun ownership by the individual is fundamental to
> > this country; in the last few years many constitutional experts have
> > examined the 2d Amend. and construed it to guarantee rights to the
> > individual, rather than the government militia. In my read that's
> > exactly what it states.
> >
> > "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
> > free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
> > not be infringed."
>
> And where are the militias who bear arms to protect
> the security of their states?
>
They are on the southern border war zone- should be hearing
something from there soon.
