--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 2:29 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > Wise woman. The "tell" on this one is that > > Judy still keeps trying to suck people back > > into a ten-year-old debate. What this vendetta > > is really about is her trying to get a belated > > revenge against Skolnick for the crime of col- > > lecting her own quotes and putting them up on > > the Web to show people what she's like: > > > > http://www.aaskolnick.com/junkyarddog/ > > > His research does show that some things don't change. > The "Stone Effect"?
I was going to leave the poor woman alone, but this second attempt in a week to rejuvenate an argument that was old and boring ten years ago really made me think of those over-the-hill Hollywood divas who sit in their houses watching their old movies over and over again. Some people "shore up" their shaky sense of self by referring to or bragging about their accom- plishments in life. They show photos of their kids, they tell people to read their old books, they suggest they watch their old movies or talk about the money they've made or their successes in the world of business. Judy Stein consistently tries to get people to read her old Internet arguments. THOSE are what she seems to think of as her "accomplishments" in life. She's particularly fond of trying to get people to go back and read some exchange from years ago in which she "got" one of her enemies or embarrassed them. I honestly believe that Judy's tendency to *assume* that anyone who says something less than positive about TM on FFL or in an inde- pendent (non-TMO) research study is "biased" or is an attempt to "get" the TMO is PROJECTION. That's what SHE does. Her attempts to do this are what she considers her "accomplishments" in life. Therefore she assumes that everyone thinks the same way.
