Judy, You seem firmly in Hillary's camp. Firm enough anyway.
As someone who specializes in dotting i's and crossing t's, I just don't know how you can be silent about the 11th hour pardons of Bill, Bill's do-nothingness about the African genocidal slaughter, the sleazoid business dealings, the hundreds of "people who associated with Bill" that died in mysterious manners/timing, the blow job, the "didn't inhale," the "definition of 'is,'" Bill's using of presidential coattails and breaking of tradition and quasi-co-candidacy campaigning, and the general all around same-ol-same-ol political pork and smoke-filled-backroomizing of these two smarmy money-rats. I'd rather vote for Girish than Hillary. Obama has the same war-mongering advisers, and I don't trust him, but for someone to be inspiring is more than just rabble rousing -- it is putting folks' attention on a higher level -- THE MAHARISHI EFFECT is operative here -- if you believe such things. If not, who the fuck cares if Obama's plans are not solid -- we know what north star he is guided by. Hillary is guided by HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS that she's going to get if she and Bill can pull off a victory. Yeah, road to hell, good intentions, and we all go down the tubes with a smooth talking hippy who can't get anything done in Washington -- I get that, but for you to side with Hillary without mentioning her very obvious faults is a tell that you're a true believer, not a truth believer. If forced to, I'll vote Obama. If forced to, I'll vote for the Green Party rather than Hillary. On a bad day, I'd vote for Ron Paul just to watch it all melt down to states' rights squabbling, but at least we'd get some of the GlobalBiz bastards sweating hard. Edg --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > wrote: > > > > On Feb 15, 2008, at 8:24 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > > Watching Obama reminded me VERY strongly of watching Werner > > > Erhard, the est leader, on stage in front of tens of thousands > > > of people in the 80s (and on videotape of Erhard at the > > > Hollywood Bowl in the 70s.) Obama has precisely the same kind > > > of universal appeal, the same kind of declarative "making a > > > difference" saving the world approach. He's even using many > > > of the same words and the crowd ate it up. > > > > Oh, please. What nonsense. > > Did you ever attend a Werner Erhard event? > > My sister made a similar observation some weeks ago, > comparing Obama's pitch with Erhard's Hunger Project. >
