--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Stu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I could be wrong of course, but I always felt > > > > Deepak's writing showed a lack of understanding > > of > > > > Maharishi's teaching. > > > > > > Another way of looking at it, George, is that > > > Chopra *disagrees* with Maharishi's teaching. > > > > > > That does not imply that he never understood it. > > > > > I have been to a number of Chopra's lectures. After > > a few one sees a > > pattern. He has a few concepts down pat and then he > > wings it from > > there. He is an excellent public speaker and writer > > and is able to hide > > is lack of scholarly depth. > > > > I think George is correct here. Chopra lacks the > > understanding. He is > > somewhere on my level. > > I agree. In another post i noted that when ever i > heard him speak when he was with the TMO it was clear > that he did not truly understand what MMY was talking > about. Some very core concepts were not understood. > From time to time I'd see MMY correct him as he was > speaking.
I have to agree. And it must have been pretty far off if I sensed it, since I'm not a teacher.
