(Hopefully) One last blovial blast of hot air - - - When observers are gathered in His Name - aka gathered in TC, then they all have the same initial distinction of Self - and therefore identical distinctions of non self - then there is nothing but Truth, but they won't agree on it by force of habit
As you may have heard, we (Madison WI) are expected to get 6-8 more inches of snow on Sunday - - that will put us over 2x the average for the whole season. A few years back I picked up a used snowblower, my plan is for it to have the heart attack before me. L --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Matthew 18:18-20 (King James Version) > King James Version (KJV) > > 20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I > in the midst of them. > > Larry, > > "What we have here is a failure to communicate." > > Any egoic projection fits your views, below, but pure truth seemingly > IS available whenever two or three are specifically gathered for the > purpose of discovering it. Not that they will find it, mind you, the > promise is that it is there -- presumably those with deep intent can > REALIZE it > > Hmmmm, let's see now, how many are gathered here today? > > Edg > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Larry" <inmadison@> wrote: > > > > Thinking back now, I should have included a smily face, then it > > wouldn't have come off as such a wild ass axiom - but too late now. > > > > What I should have said was: If you have two or more observers, you > > can not have Truth. > > > > As each observer distinguishs self - what lies outside of that first > > distinction is everything else, which includes the other observers. > > So, for each observer, what lies 'outside' that first distinction is > > different because it includes the other observers. > > > > Let's ask a basic question . . . is the car red? > > > > Well, what makes the car red is exactly the same as what makes it not > > red. For example, we can pick out a candle because of its bundle of > > properties, including the space it occupies. We can make the > > distinction of 'the candle' because there is a 'not candle' to > > dintinguish it from. The dintinction between the candle and 'not > > candle' is the same distinction - it's the same boundary. > > > > Sort of like my grandfather who used to bug me with questions like: > > Does the mortar keep the bricks apart, or does keep them together? > > > > So getting back to the car . . two or more observers can not equally > > dintguish the car, because the 'not car' distinction includes the > > other observers . . so therefore, the distinction of the car will also > > be different between observers. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander > > <mailander111@> wrote: > > > > > > Really? How do you figure? > > >
