Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurusheya bhasya in the light of linguistics

[Zoran Krneta]

You are suggesting that there is a Brahman on one side which can be known
through transcendental knowledge and on the other side is everything else
like ego, mind, senses... etc.
What kind of Brahman is that which doesn't include everything and can not be
the object of gross perception?
Seems you fall in trap of dualism...