--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can't figure you out, Pete. > > Your love for Sri Sri is obvious, that's very understandable, but, > yipes!, you toss your hat into a war-monger's camp? > > It's a disconnect that, as a professional healer, you could be > supportive of the state-sponsored murdering of third world children > for oil. > > What deep fear inside you is resonating with McCain's fears? > > Where's the "love is the answer" sweetness of Sri Sri in your stance? > > Honest, you really really surprised me. > > Edg
McCain Ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gwqEneBKUs == McCain is less than truthful? "I'm going to be honest: I know a lot less about economics than I do about military and foreign policy issues. I still need to be educated." ~~ John McCain - Wall Street Journal - http://tinyurl.com/7pfca "The issue of economics is something that I've really never understood as well as I should. I understand the basics, the fundamentals, the vision, all that kind of stuff," he said. "But I would like to have someone I'm close to that really is a good strong economist. As long as Alan Greenspan is around I would certainly use him for advice and counsel." ~~ John McCain - Baltimore Sun - http://tinyurl.com/322e3r Here's John McCain in a later debate: Watch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bogh_sp5SE0 > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > Well, I disagree. I see McCain as a pragmatist who is > > more interested in solving problems than pushing > > ideologies to solve problems. > > > > --- Patrick Gillam <jpgillam@> wrote: > > > > > There's a school of thought which > > > holds that presidential administrations > > > work within the context of larger political > > > paradigms. Hence, Dwight Eisenhower and > > > Richard Nixon, while Republicans, did not > > > try to undo the social programs of Franklin > > > Delano Roosevelt, in whose political paradigm > > > those GOP presidents served. Only presidents > > > of the current Reagan paradigm have tried to > > > undo Social Security and the FDR legacy. > > > Another tenet of this theory is that the > > > last chief executive to serve in a given > > > paradigm is consistently seen as a failure. > > > Hence, history looks down on Herbert Hoover > > > and Jimmy Carter, who presided over the ends > > > of the Lincoln and FDR eras respectively. > > > > > > The question now is, who will preside over > > > the end of the Reagan era? It seems that > > > Bush 43 would have the dishonor, seeing as > > > his presidency has been of such questionable > > > worth to the nation and the world. But who > > > knows - the Reagan paradigm may not have yet > > > played itself out. Bush and Cheney may not > > > have ground it entirely into the dirt. > > > > > > Now we're determining whether Bush 43 is > > > the last president in the Reagan era, or > > > whether it may continue. If McCain is > > > elected, it almost surely means the > > > Reagan era is continuing, and if that's > > > the case, we can bet that it will continue > > > its downward slide. And if you accept all > > > that, you have to think that McCain could > > > preside over more failures than even George > > > W. Bush. > > > > > > Ergo, I disagree with Peter below. From > > > the worldview I've tried to outline above, > > > a McCain presidency would promise even > > > worse times than what President W has > > > administered. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter > > > <drpetersutphen@> wrote: > > > > > > > > One thing I know for sure, either Obama or McCain > > > > would make a much better president than the true > > > fool > > > > we have in there now. > > > > > > > > --- Rick Archer <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > On Behalf Of suziezuzie > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:40 PM > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: This is why, > > > > > ultimately, Obama will NEVER be > > > > > president > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I doubt that because Obama really a pie in the > > > sky > > > > > tax and spend > > > > > liberal with no qualifications what so ever. > > > McCain > > > > > is the better > > > > > choice since he has promised not to raise taxes > > > and > > > > > has more political > > > > > experience. He's better for the country. > > > > > > > > > > Oh yeah. The Iraq war has been just great for > > > the > > > > > country. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Or go to: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > > >
