--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Frank McLaughlin" > <frank3373@> wrote: > > > > This post begs two questions: 1) was the TM org in better shape when > > Chopra was active in the early 90's? What is different now and then? > > 2) What is wrong with the current state of the TM org other than > > everything is too expensive (in the US), but that has been the > > case for a long time. -- Frank > > > With all due respect, "King Tony" reacts to being > told the "horrible truth" that Maharishi is (wait > for it) mortal and can get sick like everyone else > with a pathological level of denial, and the only > two questions that this "begs" to you are about > the state of the TM movement? >
With a ll due respect, you assume that Chopra is telling the truth about telling this to Nader in the first place? > Personally, I'd be more concerned that the future > of a 2.5 billion dollar organization and the welfare > or all the people who believe in it has been entrusted > to a crazy person. > > You think Chopra isn't a tad crazy too? I mean, according to HIM, MMY is the only person in his life he's ever met whom he is certain was fully enlightened.... Lawson
