I predict that BigMedia will hardly support this "outing" as something that "should" have been done. If they get too much into the moral outage and that phone taps are a legitimate way to reveal the deceit of politicians, OOOOO BOY, then why not tap everyone's phones?
Can you imagine what else would be found if the bank statements and phone records and taped phone calls of all the politicians were to be garnered by some sort of spying program? Who would have even a remote chance at coming off as "squeaky clean" after such an invasion? So this is interesting and will be entertaining to see how BigMedia handles this. Too much "official condemnation" and the whole house of cards comes down, but if not enough moral outrage is shown, it will seem that an invasion of the Gov's privacy has been perpetrated for no reason. Spin spin spin. Edg --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > shempmcgurk wrote: > > Why can't Democrats have kinky scandals like the Republicans and Larry > > Craig? They are so boringly normal with all this heterosexual stuff. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/2usgwb > The question today is why were federal wiretaps used? Aren't they > supposed to be after terrorists? I thought that was why Dubya wanted > them so he could protect us against terrorists not prostitutes. Oh > that's right everyone who doesn't agree with Dubya is a terrorist > especially Spitzer. >
