The syntax of your last sentence is not entirely transparent to me. Please clarify.
--- Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Homogenized milk is actually heterogeneous. > Homogenous means -same throughout- and is always > clear though it may have color. This is because > compounds in such mixtures are perfectly integrated. > Heterogeneous mixtures show compounds, such as in > the whitish color of particles in milk. They may be > well suspended, but they still stand out. > > Thus transparency is a feature of true integration. > Heterogeneous solutions will show different mixtures > at different spots. Thus ambivalence. > > We could use these two analogies to decide whether a > person or group of either spiritual or political > entities is integral or merely appropriating. > > Someone of integrity is transparent because > homogeneous in their ethics, ontology, epistimology. > Someone else, like in homogenized milk, may seem to > be something and yet they aren't. In fact it's > almost a truism that the more someone seems like > something the less they are that. > > It is almost certain that the most integrated people > cannot be discerned in any possible way being most > transparent. It stands to reason. > > Okay, now you try it, look around and see. Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
