This whole discussion is about semantics--and, as such, it can go on forever without shedding any light anywhere.
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Angela Mailander wrote: > > So if that is the goal, how could it be different > > unless it contained some distinguishing > > characteristic--which, by definition, it does not > > and cannot. > > > In Yoga there is no goal, and Yoga is not a > step-wise > path; Knowledge is Light, ignorance is nescience. > Where > there is Light, there is no nescience. As H.H. Swami > > Bramhananda said: > > "The techniques are not there to throw light on the > Brahman-Essence. They are there to dispel darkness. > Brahman-Essence is Light itself; it needs no other > light to illuminate it." > > Read more: > > Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental > Subject: Where there is Light, there is no nescience > From: Willytex > Date: Thurs, Oct 6 2005 12:24 am > http://tinyurl.com/23skll > > This story illustrates the concept of the mind as a > perciever, a witness, something that cannot be > itself > subject to analysis. The mind cannot examine itself, > > and since the mind cannot become an object of its > own perception, its existence can only be understood > > intuitively through the practice of inner enquiry. > Don't just do something, sit there. > > Read more: > > Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental > Subject: Don't just do something, sit there > From: Willytex > Date: Fri, Oct 7 2005 > http://tinyurl.com/yv9th8 > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
