--- In [email protected], "sandiego108" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], off_world_beings 
> <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> > >
> > > No TMO researchers have been caught a number of times with bad 
> > > data and exaggerated claims, >>
> > 
> > How many years have you been peddling this unsubstabtiated BS 
> > here Vaj, and how much more of your life will you waste on this 
> > huge exaggeration of yours? You sound like a broken record, that 
> > no-one listens to.
>
> Reminds me of the Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons that knock on my 
> door from time to time. I am sure Vaj has the same missionary zeal 
> to convert us all to Buddhism, away from 'evil' TM.

Does anyone else find it fascinating that Tru-Blue
TMers perceive anyone *mentioning* another path -- 
even when they do NOT "push" or "sell" it, or, as
Vaj does, NEVER "push" or "sell" it, and fail to
even mention any links or lectures or any way any-
one would go about "signing up" for it -- as an
attempt to "convert" them.

I would suggest that this is a far more interesting
phenomenon than Vaj's bias in favor of good science.

It suggests to me that all the decades of demonizing
anyone who even *reads* about another spiritual path
other than TM -- let alone visits another teacher or
tries another technique -- has WORKED. The TMers are
so terrified of being perceived as going "off the
program" that they interpret even a mention of another
path as an attempt to "lure them off of the highest
path."

Fortunately, there are a few people here who resisted
this indoctrination, and still seem to have minds
that function. I'm sure they will be able to sift 
through what is bias in Vaj's posts and what is not.
Personally, I don't think that anyone needs the 
professional apologists to "translate" for the rest
of us and keep repeating their consistent message:
that *everything* he says is some kind of "hit" 
against TM, and that *everything* he says is not
to be trusted. That is their consistent -- and only --
message, whereas Vaj seems to have something to say.

Just my opinion...



Reply via email to