> > Karma, for me, encompasses the action/reaction part 
> > of nature, and sometimes this matches up with what 
> > we think is poetic or moral, but I don't think nature 
> > holds itself to our standards of just deserts.
> >
Sal wrote:
> Of course it doesn't. Any attempt to make it conform 
> is usually the person's own narrow sense of 
> self-preservation or fear that the universe really 
> is an unpredictable maelstrom.  In Jim's case, its the 
> fear that his idiotic windbag rants won't get taken
> seriously. Or maybe being subjected to his nonsense 
> is the penalty for some horrible karmic debt we accrued 
> somewhere along the line. Must have been a doozy.
> 
Your karma is that you totally don't understand the idea
of karma, so you got waxed real good by Jim, when he
pointed out that karma means cause and effect. Instead of
responding to Jim's argument you, as usual, started to
call Jim a windbag. Now that's a doozy way to debate!

Reply via email to