--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:14 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > And she's only behind in the popular vote by around > > 700,000, a very small percentage of the total votes > > cast. > > 1-3 mill, Judy.
It's a lot more than that, Sal. Where did you get that figure? > > If Obama would stop blocking a revote or other fair > > solution of the Florida-Michigan problem, it would be > > even closer; she'd probably pass him in both the > > popular vote and the delegate count. But it would > > still come down to the convention. > > Oh, Judy, that's pathetic. You know as well as anyone she > agreed to discount those delegates because they broke the > rules. Oh, Sal, you're so far behind on this one I can't even begin to try to clue you in. There's *vastly* more to it than that. I'm about to make another post that goes into a few of the details, so you can maybe begin to get a glimmering. Here's a good, very long and detailed, article on HuffPo for some of the background: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wayne-barrett/could-the-republicans- cou_b_94158.html http://tinyurl.com/3y4hfn That > was before she started losing, so now she wants to change the > rules she agreed to, which would undoubtedly be to her advantage > as Obama didn't campaign in either state and wasn't even on the > ballot in one. > > You're condoning lying and cheating, Judy--admit it. Yeah, just like I've said I really want McCain to win, right, Sal? ROTFL!! You're clueless. And a liar to boot.
