--- In [email protected], "hugheshugo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > This summer will be the 2nd anniversary of the Invincibility project > > in the Domes. Much noise was flaunted by JH about the glorious > effects > > on the stock markets. "statistical studies "proved" the ME was > > creating a huge surge that had less than an infinitesimal chance of > > being a coincidence > > > > > > Actual Effect: > > > > Markets almost back to level of 2 years ago. Decline in the last > year. > > > > And look at the five year chart. Does the ME period just POP out at > > you. Clearly distinct and better than the prior three years? > > > > > > > > 1 year chart > > > > http://tinyurl.com/6rqyhj > > > > you can click the 2 and 5 year tabs on this charge to see these > other > > periods. > > > > I've absolutely no doubt that J Hagelin will apply some > "time series anaysis"* to this chart and conclusively prove > that the Invincible America course has been the best thing ever. > > And just like the Washington study, that only proved crime rates > fell against what was predicted if you take the weather into account, > when they didn't actually fall even a little bit**, it will enter TM > lore as definitive proof of the ME. >
Actually, IIRC, the absolute numbers and the violent crimes per 100,000 both fell slightly, (discounting murders). It was bit a more dramatic once you took the temperature into account and there's nothing wrong with taking temperature into account, though in roder to strengthen their case, they'd need to publish a study on ALL summer data ever collected to show the correlation independently of the ME study time period. > A press release will be sent out but will mysteriously only be > published on the GCWP site. They're gonna have to keep trying to > convince the rest of us. > > > * That's "massaging the numbers" or > "cooking the books" to you and me. > > ** Just spent a week checking government figures. > It's all there, go have a look. >
