It is a question of learning Transcendental Meditation or not. Many 
of my students have first called TMO, and after they have turned away 
from the prices, they come to me. I tell my students about the 
difference between me and the TMO before they start, so everybody 
have the chance to make a choice. It is called Free Will.
Ingegerd

--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I went to the Register office for Trademarks in Norway and talked 
> to 
> > a Lawyer in the office. The TMO had applied several times to get 
> > registered "Transcendental Meditation" as Trademark. Every time 
> they 
> > were turned down. The Lawyer told me that the 
word "transcendental" 
> > is a description of a state in consciousness, and that they would 
> not 
> > accept to trademark a description of a word. The same 
> > with "meditation". So she said: "You should just go ahead and use 
> > Transcendental Meditation in you advertising". But this is 
Norway - 
> > maybe it is different in other countries - I do not know. 
> > Ingegerd
> 
> So you feel that the TMO doesn't offer anything of value that is 
> added on to TM/Transcendental Meditation, and therefore you don't 
> worry about deceiving your potential clients?
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], "Ingegerd" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I checked it up in Norway. TMO has no Trademark on 
> Transcendental 
> > > > Meditation - and will not have it in the Future, because 
> > > > Transcendental is a description of a state of consciousness 
and 
> > is 
> > > > universal. I do not know about other countries, maybe it 
would 
> be 
> > > > wise to check out. The more people using Transcendental 
> > Meditation 
> > > in 
> > > > their marketing outside the TMO, the more difficult it will 
be 
> to 
> > > get 
> > > > it as Trademark
> > > > Ingegerd
> > > 
> > > And this is a good thing?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > BTW, how did you checkthis out? Are you saying that there is NO 
> > > registered trademark? What about the "Maharishi Technology of 
the 
> > > Unified Field," for instance?
> > > 
> > > >  
> > > > > > >  I guess I'll just either have to teach quietly or wait 
> for 
> > > the
> > > > > > > lawsuits and their resolution. I'm pretty sure that 
they 
> > will 
> > > > > happen
> > > > > > > soon enough.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I seriously doubt that there will be any lawsuits.
> > > > > > As Ingegerd has pointed out, the TMO is afraid to
> > > > > > bring any real intellectual property case to court
> > > > > > because their case is so weak.  Also, if you read
> > > > > > between the lines of "recertification," especially
> > > > > > the part about having to do it over and over again
> > > > > > every few years, that's a lawyer thang.  What I've
> > > > > > heard is that NONE of the agreements asked of 
> > > > > > teachers along the way are now legally enforceable.
> > > > > > So the recert program is to create a whole new set
> > > > > > that will be legally enforceable.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Unc
> > > > > 
> > > > > One agreement certainly is enforceable: trademark.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to