Why do you assume that the CIA is in collusion with Israel and not
Iran?
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Iran doesn't even have to nuke Israel. All that has
> to happen is for the CIA (perhaps in collusion with
> the Mossad) to stage a false flag attack against
> Israel and blame it on Iran.
>
>
>
> --- Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Indeed, this is chilling and her own remarks pretty
> > much close the
> > case against Hillary: she capable of blindly killing
> > millions and thus
> > places herself in the Guinness Book of World Records
> > as the mass
> > murderer of all time. Hitler's body count would be
> > as if nothing.
> >
> > If Iran bombs Israel with nukes, the whole world
> > would condemn Iran,
> > and the extreme pressures put upon them would
> > virtually starve that
> > country to its knees and bring about a regime change
> > in short order,
> > and I would guess that a U.N. army with virtually
> > every country
> > contributing to that army would invade Iran and
> > probably kill a
> > significant percentage of the Iran's leaders for war
> > crimes. No
> > matter how hated the Jews, no matter how much the
> > Iranians have a GOOD
> > REASON to be angry at Israel, any bombing with nukes
> > would kill so
> > many innocents so instantly that a massive
> > shuddering revulsion would
> > rocket through the globe's psyche and Iran would be
> > as doomed as
> > post-war Germany for decades of military occupation.
> >
> >
> > But Hillary would rather bomb them all to quarks.
> > This is so
> > abhorrent that words cannot express the disgust any
> > decent person
> > would have towards the evil mindset that could
> > actually do such a thing.
> >
> > Not that Obama with his "invade Pakistan if
> > necessary" statements is
> > coming off much better. An invasion is an army that
> > takes more time
> > to create the carnage of a nuke, but it still gets
> > the job done.
> >
> > The thing about Hillary's statement is that it is so
> > FUCKING STUPID
> > regarding the state of geo-politics, the natural
> > values of human
> > consciousness, and, get this, THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.
> >
> > 1. You can't bomb Iran without creating fallout
> > that will travel
> > around the world via the jet streams -- eastwardly
> > traveling across
> > Asia before crossing the Pacific Ocean to get to
> > America. This is
> > simple laws of nature at work, and anyone who gets
> > rained upon by
> > nuclear fallout will consider itself -- ABSOLUTELY
> > CORRECTLY -- as
> > having been attacked. Even tactical nuking and even
> > neutron bombs
> > would still put the entire world at serious risk.
> >
> > 2. Iran's oil is desperately needed by China etc.
> > and ending that
> > supply source would be as if a direct attack up on
> > Asian countries.
> >
> > 3. It would create a terrorist mindset in virtually
> > all Muslims
> > everywhere. The peaceful Arabs in the USA right now
> > would all have
> > some relative dead and crispy. The internment camps
> > would not be
> > large enough to absorb the 100,000 angry Arabs
> > Hillary would instantly
> > create. There would be gunfights on every corner in
> > America. And the
> > terrorist actions that ARE NOT NOW HAPPENING BUT
> > COULD HAPPEN IN
> > AMERICA would be insured. Railroad tracks
> > dislodged, power plants
> > attacked, dams blown up, poison in water supplies,
> > dirty bombs,
> > suicide bombers -- the whole mess.
> >
> > 4. Russia, China, Pakistan, Indonesia, India all
> > have nukes too and
> > they'd be the ones most harmed from fallout, oil
> > supply destruction,
> > and a massive humanitarian impact upon their
> > populations.
> >
> > 5. Any American traveling abroad would be killed
> > out of hand by
> > almost any Muslim. Why not, eh? In fact, Hillary
> > is saying, "Israel
> > is our family and if you kill them, we'll kill you."
> > So, reverse it
> > and you'll understand what nuking Iran would do to
> > the Muslim
> > populations of the world.
> >
> > 6. Christians would then jump aboard and officially
> > declare what
> > their evil spamming emails usually say: "Islam is
> > not a religion --
> > it is an evil system of Satanic mind control that
> > must be, via
> > genocide, erased from the Earth."
> >
> > 7. It could only and obviously be the start of
> > World War III.
> >
> > Sorry, Judy, by your candidate is now officially
> > insane.
> >
> > Edg
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
> > <vajradhatu@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2008/04/to-hillary-clinton-
supporters-
> >
> > > your.html
> > >
> > > Okay, good and honest Hillary Clinton supporters,
> > men and women,
> > > let's have a little history lesson for some
> > context. Back in 1984,
> > > our then President, Ronald Reagan, no doubt in the
> > early stages of
> > > Alzheimer's, made a little joke while testing a
> > mike. Not thinking
> > > anyone beyond the studio would ever hear, he said,
> > "My fellow
> > > Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've
> > signed legislation
> > > that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing
> > in five minutes."
> > > When the quote got out, Reagan's lead over Walter
> > Mondale slipped
> > > (very temporarily) by seven points. The Left was
> > justifiably in an
> > > uproar over it. And Reagan was making a joke - a
> > bad one, one that no
> > > doubt revealed his actual mindset, but, still and
> > all, a joke.
> > >
> > > For the third time now, Hillary Clinton, your
> > candidate, has non-
> > > jokingly threatened to destroy Iran if that nation
> > launches a nuclear
> > > strike on Israel. At the debate last week, she
> > said Iran would face
> > > "massive retaliation." On Olbermann last night,
> > she reiterated that
> > > and added, as if to clarify, that Iran's "use of
> > nuclear weapons
> > > against Israel would provoke a nuclear response
> > from the United States."
> > >
> > > Today, she took it even further, into territory
> > that, c'mon, admit
> > > it, Clinton supporters, if a Republican had said
> > it, you'd be going
> > > nutzoid about the fearmongering and paranoiac
> > fantasizing. Said
> > > Clinton on Good Morning America, "I want the
> > Iranians to know that if
> > > I'm the president, we will attack Iran. In the
> > next 10 years, during
> > > which they might foolishly consider launching an
> > attack on Israel, we
> > > would be able to totally obliterate them."
> > >
> > > Yes, she claims to be saying it only to offer
> > deterrence. But,
> > > really, isn't that understood about the United
> > States? That if we
> > > wanted to, we could "totally obliterate" most of
> > the Earth? So, by
> > > saying it, Clinton accomplishes something of a
> > pandering trifecta:
> > > she lets the Israel-humpers know she's willing to
> > wreck shit for
> > > them, she lets the pro-military people know she
> > ain't scared of shit,
> > > and she lets gun owners know she's willing to fire
> > the largest gun of
> > > all. Who's got the biggest dick now, eh, Barack?
> > >
> > > (Note: the above line is not unconscious and
> > dunderheaded sexism. It
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>
