--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I was trying to point out that 
> > > if I understood you correctly concerning
> > > your creation of objects perceived (feel free to correct however I
> > > have mangled your POV) the implications lead to solipsism which is
> > > used in philosophy more as a cautionary tale of a direction of
> > > thinking than a proposal for a POV to be adapted. 
> > 
> > I am not sure that a S. POV needs to be adopted. That there are
> > natural's. And not psychotic.
> 
> And I would agree. Seen as a POV, and *only* a POV,
> I see nothing wrong with "playing with" the notion
> of solipsism. When one holds that it is the only,
> or the "highest" POV, then I see an issue.
> 
> > Regardless, this discussion has let me slip in and out of that view.
> > One thing that is clear from that view is that Everything is
> > projection. Which is not a dis word. One can project positive, 
> > neural and negative things in one's perception of the "dream 
> > people" out there -- which are really ME. And projections of my 
> > style of perception, epistimology, biases -- particularly 
> > confirmation bias,cognitive errors etc.
> > 
> > And at the core of some of the discussion is the "when a tree 
> > falls in the forest and no one is around, does it make a sound" -- 
> > thing. Even "is the tree even there". I think yes, which is 
> > counter to what I understand Jim's view is. Correct? Is the tree 
> > not there?
> 
> Exactly. That was the whole point of my little
> "solar plexus" exercise. I think the tree is 
> really there as well. You may not see it from
> your point of view, and thus may come to believe
> that it doesn't exists. But if it falls, and falls
> on YOU, you're still dead meat.
>

But I won't really be dead to some because they weren't watching. But
thats ok since they are only dream figures in my mind. (Of course. I
may only be a dream figure in my dream figure's minds. Whew, like an
infinite regress of dreams.) 

Reply via email to