--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > I just read most of the "deranged" thread. > > > > I avoid the political discussions. These days I think most about what > > candidate is the one my group can best work with on health care > > issues. Clinton is the most prepared and most focused on the issues. > > Obama is aware of the issues and likely will have some focus on health > > care. McCain is weakest, but he recently came around on some of the > > HC issues I care about. I think we can work with any of them, but we > > still truly hope for a democrat because HC is a democrat issue. I can > > easily and happily live with Clinton or Obama. > > > > Now that disclosure is over, I must say that this campaign is filled > > with blown out of proportion issues, much like the last campaign. > > Give me an effing break--does anyone really think that Hill meant to > > create the impression that she is staying in the race because Obama > > might get whacked? Right, like that wouldn't backfire. > > I heard and saw the interview. She had the same tone as her oft used > claim, "I don't know why they do it,I JUST find it interesting". To me > it reeked of the oft used, unstated 'connect the dots' -- but I have > plausible deniability if you do, wink wink. A slimy tactic used by > many politicians -- but which she has tried to make into an art form > (but she is a low grade B artist-- unlike Bill -- and I am not sure > which skill level is more dangerous). > > But I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Lets suppose she was not > pandering to her claimed hardworking white bigoted redneck > constituency. Lets assume she was innocent as a lamb. Then clearly I > to not want such a naive, insensitive loose cannon answering the phone > at 3am. > > and btw, didn't it backfire? So add "not very street" to the list > above -- and I worry that she is even in the Senate.
This is exactly what I mean. You put a lot of significance in what she said so that no matter how you look at it, she f'd up. I just didn't view it the same way, with the same <i>significance</i>. Keep in mind, I can take either Clinton or Obama, it doesn't matter much to me. >
