--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> Interesting answers, but not to the question I was asking, > or meaning to ask. I didn't make it clear enough in my > first try, and that is my fault. I wasn't asking whether > it was possible that you could be mistaken about being > *permanently* enlightened, I was asking whether it was > possible that you could be mistaken about being enlight- > ened, period. > > Are you willing to stand on "Nope?" > So if I defined enlightenment and you agreed with most of the definition, and I said I based the definition on my experience and you ask me if I could be mistaken about my experience (of enlightenment), then doesn't life turn into one big infinte regress, and as a result nothing means anything?
Sure, OK. Nothing means anything...though not a very enlightening conclusion for you I suspect.
