TurquoiseB wrote: > Yeah, that's the ticket. That'll enable you to > believe that you and other butt-bouncers are SO > powerful that you're influencing the weather. > So says Uncle Tantra the 'butt-bouncer'!
"Notice also that Barry appears to be refusing to amend his false earlier assertion that he paid $5,000 to listen to MMY on tape over an earphone, even after he was made to admit that the course fee actually also covered a couple of months of room and board." Read more: Subject: Re: A question for Uncle Tantra Author: Judy Stein Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: Wed, Aug 6 2003 http://tinyurl.com/4fwd7d > I prefer to think of it as the random workings > of a random universe, and the equally random > attempts by insecure human beings to place them- > selves at the "center of the action," as if it > all revolved around them. > But Barry! Almost every scientist on the planet says that the universe is not based on 'random workings' but on physics. A random universe would be chaos, monkeys would be flying out of our butts. The universe is based on cause and effect. > My bet is that if you spent a little time read- > ing Christian blogs from the Midwest, you'd find > them (or their idea of "God") taking credit for > the same "cleansing floods." > How much would you be willing to wager? > Same thing for the fundie Islamic blogs. > They ALL want to believe that 1) *they* know > what's "really" happening, and 2) that it > won't happen to *them* because they are > <insert name of fundamentalist belief > system or organization here. > So, you know what is "really" happening on the fundie Islamic blogs. > To me, all of these claims are just different > "flavors" of the same stupidity. > And your theory that the universe is based on 'random workings' makes more sense? Without you realizing it, you've just postulated the dogma of the fundamentalist believers. ROTFLMAO!!!
