--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], bob_brigante <no_reply@> wrote: <snip> > > ...elements that do not fit into an orderly > > world, and if they are incapable of getting on the make-nice > > program, they have to go -- and natural disasters and wars etc > > are the mechanisms by which this happens. > > And compassion be damned. They don't "know" the > things that WE "know," so they're expendable. > > Just as a question, Bob, how do you explain the > MUM student who "had to go" because one of the > other MUM students stabbed him? > > Was HE "incapable of getting on the make-nice > program?" <snip> > Again, did Lord Yama decide that the student who > was murdered at Ground Zero of ME-generation "had > to go?" How do you justify THAT one? <snip> > But what about the MUM student? Did Lord Yama > smite his ass as an example, or was it random? <snip> > This might explain the MUM student. He was expend- > able because some greater lesson had to be taught. <snip> > Is there any evidence that the murdered MUM student > had been "made insolent by prowess, heroism and fortune, > and inclined to take possession of the whole world?" More > than your average TM TB, that is? :-) <snip> > Was THAT the problem with the MUM student who was > murdered by one of his fellow ME-generating buddies? > He wanted to "continue living as a mad dog?" <snip> > The MUM student murdered in the cafeteria was mere > "human biomass." <snip> > Where did the murdered MUM student "go," Bob?
Barry, it's one thing to question the concept Bob is articulating. But if your whole counterargument is based on what happened to this MUM student, it's, um, pretty unconvincing. You're claiming that the example of this one very unfortunate student, who was presumably doing his best to bring about Satyuga, disproves Bob's thesis. But Bob did NOT say that *every last person* who "goes" during this period has been taken out because they were resisting Satyuga, nor did he suggest that everybody who is working to bring it about is somehow protected from death. > > So, although we will see many nifty things... > > "Nifty things?" "Nifty?" > > Bob, are you *really* going on record here as saying > that you see floods and thousands of people homeless > and the *extermination* of whole groups of people as > being part of the "peace and love character of Sat > Yuga?" And that such things are "nifty?" Looks to me as though he's contrasting "nifty" things with unfortunate things, both being the consequence of the coming of Satyuga. In other words, for Satyuga with its "peace and love character"to arrive, unfortunate things will happen to those who oppose it, while at the same time some "nifty" things will happen as well--in other words, different sets of occurrences, one negative and one positive. > The original poster suggested that the pundits need > to have their meditation checked. I'm suggesting > that you need to have your sanity checked. Perhaps, but you might want to get a logic check as well. <snip> > I'm a little sorry (but not much) to light into your > ass this way No, you aren't sorry at all, nor should you be; why deny it? However, if you're going to light into him, you need to revise your approach and bag all your complaints about the murdered MUM student, because they make no sense in this context.
