memes are responsible for the restlessness of posters?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tertonzeno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --Unfriendly should not be confused with "constructive
> confrontations". There's an "inner plane" need for a forum like
FFL.
> Basically, over the decades (recently since the 60's and
especially);
> powerful religious-oriented memes or M-Fields have been clashing
with
> stupendous consequences, analogous to the "Clash of Civilizations"
> theme originating in the 90's.
> What this amounts to is that the distinct M-fields seem to
> operate "as if" they were personalities with human-like goals. Each
> proclaims that it has the answer for the deplorable human condition.
> 2nd tenent: In order to fulfill those desires, each of the memes
> seeks to acquire as much power as possible in the entire meta-
> universe; and this entails a message: "my program is better than
the
> others".
> Confrontations arise when there are certain irreconciable
> differences between the memes. They clash, and their are sparks!
> What's going on in FFL is a mini-reflection of immense energy
> clashes going on globally, especially in the inner planes; and it's
a
> life or death struggle.
> Some of the memes will be utterly destroyed, while others will be
> engulfed into the more powerful; while still others will be forced
to
> make considerable changes to accommodate to the more highly evolved
> people incarnating in decades and centuries to come.
> The FFL confrontations are actually quite necessary; and I watch
> carefully to see how things are played out.
> This will give a small hint as to how the major M-Field clashes
will
> become resolved over the centuries to come.
>
>
> - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002"
> <danfriedman2002@> wrote:
> >
> > Rick,
> >
> > I believe you to be a man of conscience and good will. If some of
> > your moderation could lead to a more friendly FFL, I imagine an
> even
> > more open-minded conversation could take place.
> >
> > Imagine it
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Behalf Of danfriedman2002
> > > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:01 PM
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: What would FFL be without its most
> > strident
> > > voices?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As a member of the 'lurkers', I took your warm invitation and
> > posted.
> > > I'd hoped for discussion (got a bit of sarcasm instead).
Perhaps
> > FFL
> > > could be moderated a bit more closely.
> > >
> > > That's a slippery slope. We've taken a step or two down it once
> or
> > twice.
> > > Don't want to go there.
> > >
> >
>
