I definity misinterpreted your message 179502. Don't post to me with 
such disrespect.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002"
> <danfriedman2002@> wrote:
> >
> > John,
> > 
> > I received this post
> > 
> > "Dan, you're aware that Knapp is a long-time, ferocious
> > critic of TM, right? I seriously doubt he has any
> > intention of trying to "reform" the TMO. What he's
> > looking for is material he can use to make the TMO
> > look as bad as possible (and not incidentally bolster
> > his "counseling" business).
> > 
> > Some of us have known him electronically for many years
> > and don't trust him any further than we could throw him,
> > if he came within reach."
> > 
> > Someone's not being honerable here, so I think I'd better be 
> > protective of Janet. She's a friend of 40 years, and more 
> > open-hearted than most.
> > 
> > 
> > When you get your posting limit restored, please do not reply.
> 
> 
> And, with all due respect, go fuck yourself 
> and the dog you rode in on. 
> 
> If you're going to panic and call for Daddy
> or the moderators to come and save you from 
> big, bad, sarcastic Sal poking fun at you for
> being clueless, and then believe the first 
> slander you read from the first person who 
> posts it, puhleeeze go back to lurkdom. 
> 
> This is a forum for those who want to speak
> their minds about TM, the TM movement, Maha-
> rishi, and other forms of trashy fiction. We 
> LIKE being able to speak our minds, especially 
> after being not able to within the TM movement 
> for decades.
> 
> What we DON'T like as much is for some clue-
> less newb to come roaring in posting trite
> Maharishisez cliches that everyone here knows 
> by heart and that most of us rejected decades 
> ago and then getting pissy because someone pokes
> a little fun at him for acting like a dweeb.
> 
> Judy will tell you I am less than honorable, too.
> Stick around long enough, and she'll say it about
> you as well. It's just what she DOES.
> 
> But if it helps to get you off your dweeb soapbox
> and speed your silly ass either back to lurkdom or
> to some more balanced type of dialogue, I'm not
> honorable, either, so you probably won't want me
> to reply, either. For the record, I also eat small 
> children and have been known to piss on self-
> righteous dweebs in public. Be warned, and wear
> your waders.
>


Reply via email to