--- In [email protected], "Sunyata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is not technique when the technique has truly been laid > aside. This is where language doesn't suffice. Most of life > is a trance and thus a search for techniques to find "a way > out." But the way out is in. > > > But for Door Number 1, my experience is that the > > NeoAdvaita satsang experience -- while VERY > > DEFINITELY being a technique -- *can* work > > for some, but doesn't work for most. The reason > > is that in most cases the *catalyst* that could > > make the technique or method work is missing. > > It is not technique when the technique has truly been laid > aside. This is where language doesn't suffice. Most of life > is a trance and thus a search for techniques to find "a way > out." But the way out is in.
Bullshit. Saying it twice doesn't make it any less bullshit. The very fact that you repeat it verbatim indicates that it is very MUCH a technique for you. <snip> > I'm personally not into traditions. Of course not. Traditions have this tendency to actually evaluate and verify the claims of those who dare to teach in their name. It's SO much easier to dispense with that, and claim to be realized, with nothing to back it up. :-) <snip> > > There is seemingly no knowledge of "further evolution," > > of unfolding newer "levels" of realization, of "going > > forward." > > This is not my experience at all. Then explain. We'll wait. <snip> > > There IS "nowhere to go" and "nothing to become" > > to realize one's enlightenment. But at the same > > time, there is more to it than just saying those > > words, over and over. > > I absolutely agree with this last paragraph. Uh...then with all due respect, do something more than just repeating: > It is not technique when the technique has truly been laid > aside. This is where language doesn't suffice. Most of life > is a trance and thus a search for techniques to find "a way > out." But the way out is in. No matter how many times you say it, that doesn't make it any less bullshit.
