This was a first person account told by me, Ken Hassman, who was one of the two people this woman, who had just come from Bevans office, told what happened. I forgot to ask her for permission to make a videotape of her telling us this story but I'll try to remember that next time someone tells me something directly.
Ken --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "guyfawkes91" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This was many years ago but it pertains directly to Bevan and this > > topic at hand. > > > > It was at MIU and Bevan was around a lot. I was sitting with a good > > friend when a woman friend of his and an acquaintance of mine, a > > well-placed well thought of woman came over to sit with us and she was > > really dazed/spaced out. She said she had received a summons to setup > > an appointment to see Bevan and she just naturally assumed it was > > something administrative. She went to the appointment, entered his > > office, sat down, expecting nothing of what was about to be proposed. > > > > She said that in a very businesslike and even apologetic manner, Bevan > > told her he was in an odd position in that he was working all the > > time, did not have any time at all to cultivate relationships and was > > wondering if she would have sex with him. > > > > I don't remember how she said she excused herself from his office but > > she was really very discombobulated from the shock of it. She did not > > become one of his occasional consorts. This was apparently his main > > method, at least at that time, of finding occasional sex partners. > > > > Ken > Mmmmmm, well I laughed a lot about this one, and the comment thread > was very funny as well, and then thought about it for a while and > decided that actually it reads like someone has been having problems > telling dreams from reality. It sounds so much like a dream sequence > that I very much doubt it's true. There are a lot of these rumors > running around and it's always "I know someone who knew someone else > who heard that ...". Unless I have reliable independent corroboration > I'll not believe it. >
