--- In [email protected], "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> wrote:
> >
> > > FOR ABOUT THE 10,000th TIME: WE HAVE TWO -- COUNT 'EM TWO -- 
> > NATIONAL 
> > > HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS:
> > > 
> > > 1) MEDICAID; AND
> > > 
> > > 2) MEDICARE.
> > > 
> > > BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM WE SPEND ABOUT $800 BILLION A YEAR.  
THAT'S 
> > > MORE THAN 90% OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD (SEE: 
> > > http://tinyurl.com/9rz4x )
> > 
> > Correction: I meant to say "more than the GDP of more than 90% of 
the 
> > countries of the world..."
> > 
> Of what possible significance does either of these figures have to 
the
> argument??  You can prove almost anything by pointing to the fact 
that
> the US as a whole spends more on it than other countries, which we 
do
> because we're THE richest and one of the most populous countries.  
Do
> you know what the terms "per capita" or percentage means?
> 
> The relevant number is percent of the population covered by these 2
> programs.  I've heard that we spend about 1/3 of total health care
> dollars via medicare and medicaid, but that number is biased by the
> fact that medicare is for the elderly who take a disportionate
> percentage of health care dollars.




Yes, Bhairitu, but even the countries with universal health care have 
elderly people and their care constitutes the majority of health 
spending.





>  So I would guess that much less
> than 30% of the population is covered by these programs, and their
> coverage is pretty basic isn't it - at least my mother needs
> supplemental insurance as medicare doesn't begin to cover all her
> health care costs right now.



Bhairitu, almost 100% of all Medicare recipients in the United States 
have supplemental medicare insurance because Medicare only pays about 
80% of hospital costs, for example.




> 
> I don't think I've ever talked with anyone about health care issues
> who argued that the US had a strong federal health care program
> compared to other industrialized countries.

It's because you live near Berkeley.

Actually, I'm not arguing that the US has a strong federal health 
care program compared to anyone; it sucks.  I was arguing against 
using improper terms to describe a situation, a particular problem 
I've had with you in the past in this very area.  Certainly, you've 
seen me produce these very figures at least a dozen times 
before...often for YOUR benefit???


Reply via email to