Hi Billy, I know you think you are espousing a traditional, common sense approach to sexuality. One backed up by eastern, or at least popular Indian schools. But sexuality as an approach to spiritual development is also a legitimate path, if a less common one. I think you need to recognize that this is a highly individual decision, and understand that each soul knows what they need for their progress. You may think that this simply willy nilly sexual indulgence. It's not. And that may be hard for you to get your head around.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" > <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately, I think this gentleman typifies the moral character of > > > many TM meditators. Since MMY never taught morality and ethics, and > > > many if not most TM'ers adopted TM, *in lieu of Religion*, this is > > > what you get! > > > > Evidently Billy believes such issues should be kept firmly in the > > closet. For shame, for openly expressing one's desire for sexual > > gratification. BIlly, maybe you typlify the moral character of many > > meditators-a certain denial of sexual urges. > > It's not that one should deny sexual urges, but control them! Self > restraint is one the virtues Patanjali himself recommends and MMY too! > If you want to get serious about spirituality the value of > Brahmacharya is a valuable asset in your quest for self realization. > > We are free to choose as we will, and pay the price for our choices, > as MMY often said quoting Christ, "As ye sow, so shall ye reap". At > the end of everybody's life comes the judgment as to how you will be > spending the interim between lives. Will you be consumed with lust, > anger or greed? You decide...... >
