--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <fflmod@> wrote: > > > > I know of a governor who got banned because he was overheard > > talking about Ravi Shankar in the dining hall and a person who > > worked in the course office overheard and called him in for the > > inquisition. This after he retired from his�assistant professorship > > in his early 50s in order to round on CCP for life. He was able to > > get back into the dome a few months later, but was unsure enough > > of his future with the TMO during those months that he looked into > > leaving ff and moving in with his sister in Florida.�� > > I think the bottom line in this discussion is > that two people who have never been TM teachers, > have never lived in Fairfield and been subject > to these Inquisitions, and for that matter have > never done diddleysquat for MMY or the TM move- > ment in their entire lives are saying that it's > OK for the TM movement to make lifestyle demands. > After all, it's not *their* lifestyle that > is being impacted. > > People who make excuses for tyrants have rarely > experienced tyranny themselves. > > Please remember, no matter how much doubletalk > is thrown out, that what these two people are > essentially saying is that the TM movement is > RIGHT in saying that seeing any other spiritual > teacher is a crime punishable by banishment. > They'll try to dazzle you with nitpicky argu- > ments and distractions, but that's really the > stance they're taking. They're *defending* the > people who think they have the right to control > other people's lives. >
Interesting take on my response to what was originally said. Lawson
