Thank you. Llundrup - I learn something new every day.
Ingegerd

--- In [email protected], "Llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> I think what Bob means is that if a person can hold a house in one 
hand then they cannot use the mantra OM.
> 
> Oh, I see you used the plural - householders. In this case the same 
applies.  If one can hold a house in two hands then they cannot use 
the mantra OM.
> 
> On the other hand, what constitutes use exactly? For instance, I 
once worked with someone who said they were a great chef, who used an 
old garden trowel for a pie spatula. It certainly had a poor effect 
upon his reputation and earning ability.  
> 
> Maybe one shouldn't clear their throat because it sounds like Om. 
> 
> Men technically shouldn't pluck their eyebrows.
> 
> The reason oysters shouldn't be eaten certain months is that they 
also need to live.
> 
> Chickens cross the road because they weren't eaten.
> 
> Chicken Little was a chicken and shouldn't have been held to a 
level of human understanding.
> 
> Mantras like words can be used to voice ones own aspirations or to 
toe the company line. In either case a dictionary never hurts.
> 
> None of the above.
> 
> Use it or lose it.
> 
> Om or Mo, who knows?
> 
> I mixed too many weird foods today so I couldn't sleep and just 
threw up.  I'll still eat Mexican food though in the future. 
> 
> Om Mani Peme Hung. 
> 
> Om Tare Tutare Ture Soha.
> 
> Om Bhu Om Bhuvaha Om Swaha Om Maha Om Janaha Om Tapaha Om Satyam
> Om tat savitur varenyam bhargo devasya dimahi diyo yonaha 
prachodiyat.
> 
> Om Hoom Joom Sah Om Triam Bhakam Yajamahe Sugandhim Pushti Vardenam 
Urvar Ukamikam Bandhinan Mrityur Mookshaya Mamritat Sah Joom Hoom Om.
> 
> I'm still standing....
> 
> Intention is everything.
> 
> This is probably why Shiva has been excluded from the TMO.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Ingegerd 
> To: [email protected] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 3:00 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: balancing techniques
> 
> 
> I have a question about Ohm.
> I got some mantras from one of MMY Pudits - a Professor in 
Sanskrit - 
> and the instruction how to use it - and they contain Ohm. I am 
> meditating TM of course - but when I use the Mantras with OHM, they 
> are very powerful and blissfull - and gives a lot of energy. So 
when 
> you say "householders", do you only mean celebacy - or do you mean 
> common activities in the society as well. I have a lot of common 
> activities in society, and I do not find The Ohm mantras are any 
> hindrance for that. Quite opposite, I think.
> So I was really surprised when I in this Forum, learned the Ohm-
> Mantras in not for women.
> Ingegerd
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], cardemaister 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In [email protected], Robert Gimbel 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > I'm not sure what Maharishi has said about the AUM sound; 
> > > > 
> > 
> > 
> > OM is the first sound of creation, it contains all the energy in 
an 
> > undifferentiated form that is later structured by the hymns of 
the 
> > Vedas. So if you are living in a cave, using OM as a mantra, 
which 
> > aligns one with the undifferentiated, is OK, since a cave dweller 
> does 
> > not need to function in society. But OM (used a mantra for 
> meditation, 
> > not just the occasional use in saying a prayer or whatever) is a 
> > problem for a householder who needs to function in many 
> differentiated 
> > ways, that's why there are householder mantras (derived from the 
> Rig 
> > Veda). As far as ladies not using OM as a mantra, I have read a 
lot 
> of 
> > Vedic literature and I don't recall any (human) ladies following 
> the 
> > recluse path (although there were certainly some fascinating 
> stories of 
> > ladies leading their husbands to enlightenment like Queen Cuddala 
> does 
> > for Sikhidvaja in the Yoga Vasistha), so because the householder 
> path 
> > is the way to go for ladies, this would lead to barring the 
> possibility 
> > of use of OM mantra for ladies.
> > 
> > 
> > Maharishi on sanyasi mantra (OM):
> > 
> > http://www.trancenet.org/secrets/beacon/beacon2.shtml
> > 
> > "he mantras that suit the Sanyasis can never suit the 
householders. 
> > Hundreds of God-loving and God-fearing families, have been ruined 
> due 
> > to the destructive effects of Sanyasa Mantra viz, "Om". "Om" 
> destroys 
> > desires and also destroys the objects of desires and therefore it 
> > produces calmness of mind and renunciation and detachment from 
> material 
> > life only to Sanyasis when they repeat Om; to them it brings the 
> > experience of peace of mind and from this experience they 
generally 
> > recommend the chanting of 'Om' to their followers. But when a 
> > householder repeats Om, he experiences that as long as he is 
> > repeating 'Om' he feels peace of mind, but when he comes out to 
> indulge 
> > in business or household work, he finds that the air is against 
his 
> > desire and schemes. The silencing effect on the mind and 
> destructive 
> > effects in material life, both are experienced side by side. Some 
> > people say that we should ignore material life in regard to the 
> > devotional practices and Mantras. But this is a fool's ideology. 
> Can 
> > you possibly ignore the considerations of material life, when the 
> > Mantras do affect it? Select a path which will make you happier 
in 
> your 
> > material life also. Do not live in a fool's paradise. Do not 
think 
> that 
> > your sufferings end miseries of today will work as reservations 
in 
> the 
> > galleries of heaven for tomorrow. Be peaceful and happy in the 
> present 
> > and try to make this state permanent. This is the path of 
> Deliverance 
> > in Life Jeevan-Mukti, the most exalted state in human existence, 
> the 
> > state of abiding Peace and Eternal Bliss. And this you are 
entitled 
> to 
> > have through correct and suitable Sadhana. And because the 
Mantras 
> play 
> > an important role in the field of Sadhana, you must be very very 
> > careful in the selection of the Mantra. The theory of Mantras is 
> the 
> > theory of sound. It is most scientific and natural. Ladies should 
> never 
> > repeat any Mantra beginning with Om. The pronounciation of Om is 
> like 
> > fire to the ladies. This is the practical experience of many 
> devoted 
> > ladies who repeated 'Om Namah Shivaya' or 'Om Namonarayanaya' 
> or 'Om 
> > Namo Bhagwate Vasudevaya' or any such mantra beginning with Om. 
It 
> > cannot be God's wish that you should suffer in your devotion to 
> him. Do 
> > not cling to the unhelpful Mantras. The moment you find you have 
> got 
> > into the wrong train, it is wise to get down from it as soon as 
> > possible. It is foolish to stick on to the wrong train and go 
> wherever 
> > it takes you."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!' 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>   a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
>     
>   b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     
>   c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to