On Jun 19, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Rick Archer wrote: > I like the idea that moral development must precede higher spiritual > attainments. Otherwise those attainments can be misused. I wonder > whether > this is a recommendation or a requirement. We see so many examples of > people > who apparently have attained enlightenment doing screwy stuff > (literally). > Are they really enlightened, having skipped the requisite moral > development > (i.e., moral development is merely a recommendation) or self-deluded, > misinterpreting a higher state as the ultimate one (i.e., moral > development > is a requirement)? Or is moral development too subjective a value to > make > such a determination?
Well spontaneous virtue is one of the qualities of the primordial state. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
