--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > Americans are recognizing that Obama is a phenomenon in > > > American politics. If there are many racists in the Democratic > > > Party, Obama wouldn't have gotten this far in the nominating > > > process. > > > > > > IMO, there's a surging consciousness in the USA for a change > > > from the present Republican administration, and it just happens > > > to be Obama who is the best one among the Democrats to > > > challenge the Republicans. > > > > Whether he succeeds or fails. > > > > It's the clash of energies that is important. > > In other words, it's the fluctuation of the gunas, in vedic terms.
No, not at all. Energy -- and the universe composed of it -- is far more interesting and complex than the dumbed-down triumverate of energies postulated by "Vedic" philosophers. You're falling for the good/evil dualistic dichotomy. I'm talking about an energy signature which is neither good nor evil on either side, because 1) such simplis- tic distinctions don't exist, and because 2) all beings are a complex *mix* of energies of all sorts. It also has nothing to do with "evolution" and who is more "evolved" or any simplistic horseshit like that. It's just that Obama's energy mix is more intelli- gent than McCain's, by a long shot. That provides people with an opportunity to see which energy they identify with more -- intelligence or idiocy. The fact that the polls (even though they are being manipulated) are so close indicates that Americans are torn on this subject. > > > In short, Obama represents the culmination of the struggle > > > of the American people for life, liberty, and the pursuit > > > of happiness. Anything less is slavery and servitude in > > > more ways than one. > > > > I could not agree more. And interestingly, isn't > > it fascinating to see who on this forum literally > > hates the man, no matter how much they try to > > disguise it? And then you think of the number that > > these people run here on a regular basis, and its > > intent. > > IMO, some people here are intentionally provoking controversy > for the sake of notoriety in the forum. Well, duh! :-) Seriously, John, sometimes you have a tendency to state the obvious as if it were profound. > > Most of us can feel that intent, no matter how much > > they try to disguise it. Without exception, the > > posters on this forum who dislike Obama intensely > > are unhappy people, with a track record of trying > > their damnedest to make other people as unhappy as > > they are. > > Let's find out who they are by the response that you get. You mean like a homosexual calling a straight guy a homo- sexual and thinking that it's an insult? :-) THAT is what I'm talking about with regard to the clash of energies. It's not a good vs. evil thang; it's an intelligence vs. stupidity thang. No one who is the least bit intelligent (or sane) is going to go around insulting other people by insinuating that they're *just like them*.
