--- In [email protected], "sramanist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> Excellent article above with some very apt insights, many of which 
> maybe throw light onto why the "French system" suffers its 
> inefficiencies. After all, the question initially raised was not 
> about British food. It was about the apparent unfairness of the 
> percentage of agricultural subsidies that disappear into an 
> arguably inefficient French agricultural system, and this is 
> what needs to be addressed. 

How addressed?

Yes, there are government subsidies in France.  But the
thinking behind them is interesting.  It's to preserve
one's 'patromonie,' or tradition.  So if not all the 
French farmers can afford to stay in business, they
occasionally subsidize them to enable them *to* stay
in business.  This preserves jobs, but more importantly,
preserves what the French see as valuable, a way of life,
the link to their past, so that this link is not lost.

One sees the same phenomenon here in may other ways.
Why are there so many bookstores in Paris, basically 
one on every block?  Well, duh...to understand this one
all you have to do is check the prices in each of them,
and then in the larger chain bookstores.  No difference.
Discounting of books is illegal.  Therefore, without any
need for subsidies, the small bookstores can stay open,
and not be forced out of business, as has happened to
something like 70% of small bookstores in America since
the advent of Borders and Barnes and Noble and the other
big chains.

Another interesting French way of handling things can be
seen in the delayed, but inevitable, arrival of super-
markets.  If you know French culture, you realize that
*nothing* could be more antithetical to that culture and
tradition than the notion of "one stop shopping."  One 
goes to the boulangerie for one's bread, to the boucherie
for one's meat, to the poissonerie for one's fish, etc.
And you have *relationships* with all of these shop owners.
They know you by name.  They ask how your kids and old Aunt
Alice are doing.  They know your preferences.  "Your people
have been doing business with "their people" for decades,
possibly longer.

Well, the French looked at the idea of supermarkets, and
then they looked at the reality in America and in other
countries where they were allowed to pop up anywhere the
owners wanted them to.  The statistics were quite convincing.
Within two years of a major supermarket chain moving to a
town, 80-90% of the small food businesses had closed, unable
to compete.  This is simply not acceptable in France.

So they came up with a system that allows the supermarches
to flourish, while subsidizing to some extent the smaller
grocers so that they can stay in business.  The bottom line?
Everybody has a *choice*.  If the supermarkets had been 
allowed to flourish in a "free market" the way they have in
America, the consumers would no longer *have* that choice,
because there would be no small, independent grocers any more.

So it's a tradeoff in France, between slightly higher costs
and the desire to preserve one's traditions.  The article
that was posted got a little of that.  In my book it's a
good thing, and many countries would be saner if they'd
adopted it long ago.

> When visiting friends in France, Belgium or Austria the 
> phrase "Bon Apetit" or "Guten Apetite" is often heard before a 
> meal. I have been asked "What is the English wish given before 
> a meal?" I have to say that we have no such readily given 
> expression. For a laugh I sometimes say that in the UK we say 
> "Bon Chance"

:-)

Unc






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to